World Bank returns to Burma after 25 years

By HANNA HINDSTROM
Published: 17 February 2012

World Bank President Robert Zoellick has been urged to emphasise civic participation in Burma's development (Reuters)

The World Bank is set to re-engage with Burma 25 years after freezing its lending, but the Southeast Asian country must first repay several hundred million dollars in outstanding arrears.

The announcement came as the global financial institution held a board of directors meeting on the future of the country yesterday and is the latest sign that the international community is ready to welcome Burma back in from the cold.

“We are encouraged by developments in Myanmar [Burma] and we have begun the process of re-engaging with the government to support reforms that will benefit all of the people of Myanmar, including the poor and vulnerable,” said the bank’s vice president for East Asia and Pacific, Pamela Cox.

The World Bank froze all its operations in Burma in 1987 after the country’s repeated failure to meet its loan repayments or to implement economic or political reform.

According to Reuters, Burma owes some $US11.02 billion in external debt run up decades ago, while its foreign currency reserves are a little over $US7 billion.

Both the United States and the European Union have begun easing their sanctions against Burma and have indicated that they will remove further restrictions provided free and fair by-elections are held on 1 April.

Cox highlighted the importance of budget transparency and working closely with civil society organisations to promote social accountability and inclusivity. Earlier this week, Human Rights Watch urged the World Bank to “take special care to avoid further bolstering the economic elite” in its re-engagement process.

Continued violence in many of Burma’s border areas – notably Kachin state – has been a key source of concern for potential donors. The Bank insists that it will provide technical assistance on economic incentives to help with the peace process in border areas in an effort to promote peace and security.

Although the US – the World Bank’s largest shareholder — waived sanctions on limited technical assistance earlier this month, additional restrictions means it is still required to oppose any new lending by the institution.

Despite vast natural resource wealth, Burma remains the poorest country in Southeast Asia and ranks 149 out of 187 on the UN’s Human Development Index.

Tags: , , , ,

Author:              Category: Economics, News

Comments


  1. Soe Thane says:

    Pretty misleading title – World Bank didn’t ‘order’ Burma to repay its loans, it just said that it would need to repay its arrears to get new loans. It said it’s going to support reforms anyway.

  2. maungg maungg says:

    World Bank should not impose extra burdon onto the Burmese government now as repayment should either be eased, extended or converted to the softer loans or whatever it may help to bolster and to kick start the economy. If this political reversal is proven failed, most of the world communities and the country poors will be suffered again even more. Please show your helpful hand and gesture. We would earnestly and very much appreciated on behalf of the poor people,even if we have to beg for it, please… please… please.

  3. juansword says:

    The return of the world bank is a great opportunity for the Burmese government. Whatever billion $ debt
    it will be the minor case to pay back. Even a MP such as business tycoon Khin Shwe will laugh at for that. Hopefully no problem between the Burmese government and the world bank.

  4. Ohn says:

    For people who think like Hilary Clinton’s visit to Burma is similar to Christ’s second coming to the Christians, it would be well to remember that World Bank is not their father and it is going to things that is in the interest of its share holders ( here they are called contributors).

    If any thing good happens to Burma in the process it will be pure accident.

    For Burma, Burmese must work for it. WB is there for Pan-Asian resource utiliization, trade, consumer product promotion and commercial integration.

    This happens with increased rails, roads, yes- fast broadband and ports along with resource extraction- be it forest, mineral or sea products or farm produce, industrialization and the wolrd’s number plague- URBANIZATION.

    There NEVER will be real intention except lip service for true environment and nature protection or preservation of culture and tradition. Religion is not in the equation.

    Sell your tradition for 3 shoe factories and iPAD-s.

    I am sure there is an eager audience. Good luck!





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other Economics, News Stories

DVB TV

Meikhtila displaced return home

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media