US backs UN inquiry in Burma

By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE and DVB
Published: 18 August 2010

Barack Obama © Reuters

United States president Barack Obama’s administration has decided to support the creation of a UN inquiry into war crimes allegedly committed by Burmese government, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

Citing US officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the newspaper said the White House would throw its weight behind the creation of a United Nations commission of inquiry, and was also considering tighter sanctions.

The UN special rapporteur for human rights in Burma, Tomas Ojea Quintana, has called for the inquiry, which would examine allegations that the Burmese junta, led by general Than Shwe, has waged bloody crackdowns against ethnic rebels and political dissidents. Quintana visited the Thai-Burma border town of Mae Sot earlier this month and met with Burmese activists in what was said to be a fact-finding mission regarding human rights violations.

“What’s important here is that this is not aimed at the people of Burma but at its leadership, particularly at Than Shwe,” an unnamed senior US administration official told the Post.

The Obama administration came into office hoping to engage Burma, sending high-ranking envoys to the nation for talks. But the country’s regime failed to respond and is imposing strict limits on campaigning ahead of upcoming elections.

“There have been no positive results on democracy and human rights in our diplomatic engagement,” a second administration official told the Post. Human rights groups said the administration’s decision to support a UN investigation was “an extremely smart move.”

“So long as Burma’s military elite believe that their leader’s strategy of defying his people and the world is working for them personally, they will continue to resist political compromise at home and engagement with the US,” Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch said.

The commission of inquiry could be formed directly by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, or by the Security Council, though China would likely veto any investigation.

Malinowski told the newspaper that the US support for an inquiry was not likely to affect Than Shwe, but could influence younger members of the junta.

“There’s a whole generation of military elites in Burma who will be making choices in the next few years,” he said. “This is aimed at them.”

Western countries have largely expressed discontent regarding the conditions under which the junta will conduct elections on November 7 this year.

Canada’s foreign minister Lawrence Cannon also raised concerns over the issue on Monday.

“While Canada welcomes the Burmese military regime’s commitment to hold democratic elections, we have serious concerns that the elections will be held under oppressive conditions and that they will not be conducted in line with international standards,” Cannon said in a statement.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Author:              Category: News, Politics

Comments


  1. PB Publico says:

    I would think that the vetos in the security council should be applied only in cases of global or regional war and peace, not in cases like the Burmese junta’s. If vetoes cannot be disposed of, they should be rstricted. Otherwise, thugs like Than Shwe and his cronies take licence to rape, loot and kill their own people at will, for as long as those non-scrupulous countries like China and Russia back them for one reason or a nother that has nothing to do with peace and prosperity of the country and its people under duress.
    I for one welcome the US action, and suggest that the US persuade China and Russia to stay away from the use of a veto in the casse of Burma.

  2. soe linn says:

    We do APPRECIATE the US support for the creation of the UN inquiry into Crimes Against Humanity committed by the regime.

    We do hope that more and more countries will come along to support the UN investigation.

    Abundance of Rights Abuses committed by the regime!!!

  3. Denys Goldthorpe says:

    The Burmese Junta and there murderous leader Thitsaphout Than Shwe must stand trial for war crimes and human rights violations against the Burmese people.
    Canada or any country must realize that Than Shwe’s sham election is purely based on fraud. Thitsaphout Than Shwe already knows the winner.

  4. Dale Lanan says:

    Human rights of people are violated not just when they lose their voice to affect change for the better in government but when international standards for good business practices sink so low that wealth from things like oil drilling never even enters the country from which it was extracted. The Karen people and others suffer when security measures are put in place to guard pipes bringing natural gas from offshore wells straight to industrial centers in Thailand with moneys changing hands offshore feeding military and other interests of those in control. It’s scary to think what’s happening to others where timber extraction is going on in places bordering China to the North. The Earth itself is at risk, grave risk of overheat and human suffering on a scale never thought possible.

  5. PB Publico says:

    This must lead to some particular binding resolution(s) in the Security Council, where there must be some preparatory work so that no one vetoes such action(s).
    Vetoes are a real problem, an irrelevance to this century: the world community should work for one country one vote democratic system of global managewment as in the one-person-one-vote democratic practice. That would be the only viable practice in the management of the national, regional and world peace in accord with world opinion.
    Every one, including members of the Burmese junta, knows that the junta has committed many items of crime, civil as well as war. And yet, in the name of diplomacy, protocols and pragmatism, pretexts for self-interests, economic as well as political, the people of Burma are left to their fate under the military boots and baunet-attached guns, unarmewd and helpless.
    Will the world community do something about it in terms of practical, effective control over criminal (and rebel) governments? The Burmese junta is a rogue government, rebel as well as criminal.

  6. ko lay says:

    nothing gonna change inside myanma,king than shwe dont care any super power, he only care for china, north korea n india, un can only pass resolutions, but nothing gonna change. hahahaha

  7. nawla says:

    Warmly welcome and APPRECIATE of US decision. I hope more countries will join and support on it to end killing ethnic people and human rights abuse it own citizen.The brutal regime run away from it own actions, must go to trail.

  8. Rod power says:

    Hmmm? history will tell…hmm Idi Armin…Pol Popot…Hitler…General Than Shwe…so sad he had his chance to be a hero of a nation…yet he chose to be nothing…Im Rod Power

  9. Rod power says:

    Daw Aung San Suu Kyi already won the last electionin 1990 by an 82% of the peoples vote…as she her self says … “The people of Burma will not be handed their independance it is something they will have to fight for.” Im Rod Power

  10. Derek Tonkin says:

    Obama is facing mid-term elections on 2 November and is aware that his Burma policy of “engagement” is getting nowhere. With a sharp decline in his ratings in recent days over the Islam cultural centre controversy, and in deep frustration over policy failure in Burma, he recognises that the US has no core interests there, that his Burma policy has become an electoral liability and that it is accordingly expendable. Burma’s regional neighbours understand his political dilemma, but are unlikely to offer support. It is a US, not a Burma problem. A delayed White House statement is expected this week. State Department feathers have been ruffled, and they may be fighting a rearguard action to keep something of the “engagement” policy alive, but White House political interests seem sure to prevail. A precipitate call for action would be likely to lead to Asian opposition, so the President would be well advised to play it cool. But at the end of the day his concerns about the 2 November elections are likely to predominate. We shall see.

  11. PB Publico says:

    Good,if what Derek Tonken says proves to be correct. For it is self-interest of the US, or any other country for that matter, that would precipate a solid, practically effective backing accompanied by resolute action) of the Burma case for its democratic cause. That is what China, India and the ASEAN are doing in their support for the junta.





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other News, Politics Stories

DVB TV

MPs returned to Parliament in Burma’s capital Naypyidaw

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media