
Burmese soldiers have been withdrawn from conflict zones in Kachin state as both sides push for ceasefire talks, but reports from nearby Shan state suggest extra battalions have been deployed to guard the lucrative China-backed Shwe pipeline.
The movement of troops has taken place in the wake of recent talks between government officials and the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) in the Chinese border town of Ruili. The negotiations ended on 19 January with both sides failing to secure an agreement.
La Nan, spokesperson of the KIA, said the withdrawal of Burmese troops from areas around Mansi in Kachin state and Mongtong in Shan state had been expected. “They’ve been in these regions for about a year but they were always going to go back,” he said, adding that other divisions still remained.
But reports in the Thailand-based Kachin News Group suggest it may have been a redeployment rather than withdrawal – up to 1,500 troops are en route to northern Shan state close to where the KIA’s 8th Battalion is stationed. That region, which encompasses the towns of Namtu and Nam Kham, is where the oil and gas pipelines will pass through on route to China’s southern Yunnan Province.
In Muse, across the border from Ruili, the news group cited eye-witnesses who had seen “a convoy of more than 30 transport trucks carrying troops and supplies” from Kachin state. They bore the insignia of the Burmese army’s 99th Division, the same one that withdrew from Kachin state earlier this week.
The Shwe pipeline project is the centrepiece of China’s booming investment programme for Burma, particularly following Naypyidaw’s decision to scrap the Myitsone Dam, a move that triggered anger and bewilderment in Beijing. The pipeline will account for around six percent of China’s total energy needs, much of which will be focused on Yunnan, whose development has lagged behind the rest of the country.
Despite various attempts at negotiating an end to conflict with the KIA, which broke out in June last year, ending a 17-year ceasefire, fighting continues. The KNG reported that a bloody clash erupted on 20 January, also in northern Shan state.
Further south in the state, the army has begun withdrawing its soldiers from territory close to Wanhai, which is controlled by the Shan State Army-North (SSA-N). The group agreed to an initial truce earlier this month during talks in Naypyidaw, and will meet again with government officials on 28 January.
Additional reporting by Aye Nai
Tags: burma, china, gas, myanmar, oil, shwe pipeline

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
So, the Burmese “patriotic” Tatmadaw is just a chinese axe-handle (tayoke pu-hsein-yoe) protecting the neo-colonial interests of the greedy Chinese.
Isn’t this the same army that Aung San created to fight colonialism? Shame on them! What about Burmese sovereignty? Stop the invasive pipeline and the Chinese naval base at Kyaukphru!
What is going on with DVB reporting of the ethnic conflicts? You continue to refer to the KNU ceasefire even though the leadership have clarified there is no agreement and now you are writing as if the Kachin`s have practically signed an agreement even though Kachin News Group reports a mass deployment of tatmadaw and unsuccesful talks?
This type of reporting is dangerous DVB – get your act together.
http://www.bnionline.net/index.php/news/kng/12546-burma-army-redeploys-troops-to-kachin-frontline.html
Willow you clearly didn’t read the article. It says: “The negotiations ended on 19 January with both sides failing to secure an agreement.” Then it says: “Despite various attempts at negotiating an end to conflict with the KIA, which broke out in June last year, ending a 17-year ceasefire, fighting continues. The KNG reported that a bloody clash erupted on 20 January, also in northern Shan state.”
Get your act together…
Blue Moon you are right. I read the article far too fast and focused in on the first paragraph. I did this out a frustration and confusion with the reporting on the ethnic conflicts by both DVB and the Irrawaddy. International media keeps getting it wrong – ignoring the conflict and talking about a KNU ceasefire as if it is a done deal. And who can blame them when DVB and the Irrawaddy are doing the same thing?
Addressing the ethnic conflicts and concerns are such an integral part of any hope for peace and democracy in Burma.
I apologies for misplacing my criticism – you are completely right – but the general sense of frustration remains.