emergence of Capitalism, colonialism, Communism, Socialism and etc, had allowed civil society faded among society itself. However, government, capitalism (globalization) and civil society are getting loomed and at some point doomed nowadays. Civil society is like Jeremy Rifkin calls it “our last, best hope”, to defend people from the social injustices by both government and market, and to preserve democracy and human rights forward. Among the industrialized nations, the civil society has defended their society for the issues from consumer’s rights to non-nuclear proliferation since 1980s. And, the rising power of civil society with the help of modern technology in the middle-east is challenging the authoritarian and dictatorship rules in the region.

Given the circumstances, what Daw Suu is doing is smart and doing right on her part. As we have repeatedly said on, we would like the critics overseas to tone down. Let’s just think about it. International governments, organizations and scholars have more leverage to criticize Daw Suu for what she is not doing enough, but they don’t, because they understand the nature and difficulty she is facing to move forward. And, that’s why they are insisting help instead. Regardless, our own kind and kin overseas have been ruthlessly attacking Daw Suu for her remark, “She accepts the new government as it is.”, and her failure to call far general strike these days.

For their information, the national leaders don’t call the people to get killed but intervene. If we look at the uprisings in the middle-east, they all started not by the leaders but by the civil society as a whole, which we don’t have it systematically and collectively at this point. Just relax and do your part. Daw Suu definitely knows what to do every now and then for sure. We have to give her a chance to do her job. We shouldn’t discourage to those volunteers in Burma – the youths, the intellectuals and technicians helping her by risking their lives -