Suu Kyi not opposed to US sanctions ‘freeze’

By AFP
Published: 16 May 2012
Former U.S. first lady Laura Bush takes part in a teleconference with Myanmar's democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi during the "Celebration of Human Freedom" event in Washington
Former US first lady Laura Bush takes part in a teleconference with Aung San Suu Kyi during the "Celebration of Human Freedom" event in Washington on 15 May 2012. (Reuters)

Aung San Suu Kyi said Tuesday she would not oppose a freeze on US sanctions but urged caution, warning that her country could backtrack after dramatic reforms.

Suu Kyi, who was sworn in May 2 as a member of parliament after spending most of the past two decades under house arrest, spoke via Skype to a rare event in Washington involving former president George W. Bush.

Suu Kyi gave a cautious nod to a call Monday by John McCain, a leading senator of Bush’s Republican Party, for a limited-time freeze on most sanctions on Burma — similar to a recent move by the European Union.

“That is a way of sending a strong message that we will try to help the process of democratization but if this is not maintained, then we will have to think of other ways of making sure that the aspiration of the people of Burma for democracy is respected,” said Suu Kyi.

“I am not against the suspension of sanctions as long as the people of the United States feel that this is the right thing to do at the moment. I do advocate caution, though,” she added.

“I sometimes feel that people are too optimistic about the scene in Burma. You have to remember that the democratization process is not irreversible.”

Repeating one of her frequent themes, Suu Kyi said that reforms would only be considered irreversible once the military — long Burma’s most powerful institution with a history of abuses — firmly committed to changing its ways.

Suu Kyi, the winner of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, enjoys wide respect across the political spectrum in Washington and her views are considered critical to any US decision to lift decades worth of sanctions on the country.

Since taking office a year ago, President Thein Sein has surprised even many cynics by opening talks with Suu Kyi and ethnic rebels, allowing by-elections swept by Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy and freeing political prisoners.

But Suu Kyi said that Burma has not freed 271 political prisoners on a list handed by her party to the home ministry.

“There should be no political prisoners in Burma if we are really heading for democratization,” she said.

McCain, in his proposal to suspend sanctions, said Burma needed to do more to end long-running ethnic wars but that President Thein Sein was “sincere about reform.”

US President Barack Obama’s Democratic administration has championed dialogue with Burma since taking over from Bush but has been cautious about a full lifting of sanctions, saying it needs to preserve leverage to encourage change.

US companies have been eager to enter Burma, fearing Asian and European competitors will seize the growing market. The Obama administration plans to allow limited investment but is fine-tuning the rules, as human rights groups push for strict guidelines.

“The US government should not reward the Burmese government’s nascent and untested changes by allowing an unregulated business bonanza,” John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.

Suu Kyi was speaking at the Washington launch of the Freedom Collection, a project by Bush to bring together lessons from dissidents and reformers.

Tags: , , ,

Author:              Category: News, Politics

Comments


  1. laimi says:

    By law, Suu Kyi shouldn’t oppose sanction lifted after she even took oath under military led government as a parliamentarian. Boris Yeltsin made serious mistake while trying to do reform after USSR split by warring with Chechnya. I think Thein Sein is now making the same mistake like Yeltsin as he is holding peaceful reform by his left hand and war against ethnic Kachin by his right hand. National war can never be vanquished by gun as it is not just to record in book but to remain in blood which will come back stringer and stronger.

    I can’t really see the bright future of Burma with the same old foes taking reign of the nation power. How can army and enemy be friends with fighting each other out on the way to reach peaceful goal?

  2. Ohn says:

    With the sanction gone as supported, and the international money men start to take away land and employ the landless people for subsistence wage people would really miss Than Shwe then.

  3. Myanmar Patriots says:

    What else? Silver tongue tied?

  4. Tom Tun says:

    Silence of violence in Kachin state by noble laurate Aung San Suu Kyi is deafning. Is that the kind of new Burma I wanted, I ask myself. Definately not, I do not want fake changes and rosey pictures painted by media. I want to see Burma as free as it can be and the value of Democracy can be compare with any country around the world. That is what I want to see. I do not walk on the street of Burma in 1988 demanded for democracy just to make some cronies to get rich and Burmese people to enslave for the some corporations. So, I still will keep speaking out with or without any one with me. If Burma is heading to genuine Democracy, why is Burmese army continue attacking Kachin people? If Democracy is genuine, why are 25% soldier sitting in govenment without election? Why are continue land confiscation when we talk about changing rule of law. Alot of people said changes in Burma is very fast, my opinion is that changes are fast because all of it already happen are cosmetic. Holding the whole country hostage by constitution and making changes only outside appearances will never bring true Democracy to Burma. This is not the first time I see it in history. When Ne Win rob the power and turn the country into Burmese way of socialism, there were no short of fools supported Ne Win. Now, I do not surprise to see Aung San Suu Kyi and many western fools supporting Burmese way of Democracy while Kachin people get slaughter. Way to go, cheer to Noble Peace Prize, and Peace Prize recipient.

  5. Burma Observet says:

    Non action is not an action. Just passive acceptance of realities. What else can she do realistically?

  6. Burma Observet says:

    Do not compare Burma with the Soviet Union. No comparison whatsoever. Bamar-adsa Tagaungka. Never forget that.





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other News, Politics Stories

DVB TV

US support needed for reforms

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media