Democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi has called for better rights and protection of Burmese migrant workers in Thailand at a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubamrung in Bangkok yesterday.
In an hour long meeting, she pressed Thailand to allow Burmese migrant children to enrol in Thai schools in a bid to improve relations between the two countries.
Yubamrung insisted that Burmese migrant labour is crucial to Thailand’s economy, but asked that the Burmese government provide assistance with the National Verification Process (NVP) – a step required by Thai law to grant migrants legal status to stay and work in Thailand. Around 800,000 Burmese migrants have already passed the NVP, he said, adding that a 300 baht (USD 9.41) daily minimum wage for all registered workers will take effect in June.
The scheme has however courted criticism from human rights groups, who warn that it could make Burmese migrants, especially the stateless Rohingya, even more vulnerable to abuse. A deportation threat currently looms for migrants who fail to register by 14 June.
Migrants in Thailand make up about five percent of the county’s workforce, and provide a crucial pool of labour for low-skilled, often dangerous, industries such as fishing and construction. Up to three million people, or about 80 percent of the migrant population, are estimated to come from Burma. Many occupy a quasi-legal existence in the Kingdom that creates problems when attempting to access healthcare, accident compensation and legal assistance.
Migrant’s rights have been high on Suu Kyi’s agenda during her first trip abroad in 24 years. The democracy icon spent her first day addressing a crowd of migrants in Mahachai, home to some 300,000 Burmese. “We have to protect, not only the Burmese migrants’ rights but also every worker’s rights, at our best within the boundaries of the law,” Suu Kyi said. ”Let me tell you that we will never forget you. We will address your concerns.”
As promised Suu Kyi presented many of the complaints raised by the Burmese migrant community, including work place abuse, marginalisation and employer exploitation, to Yubamrung, who insisted that many of these issues had already been addressed.
Suu Kyi also urged the Thai government to help facilitate third country resettlement for some of the 150,000 Burmese refugees living on the border region, though insisting it must be on a strictly voluntary basis.
A number of groups along the border have expressed concern about the possibility of forced eviction or repatriation ahead of Suu Kyi’s scheduled visit to Mae La refugee camp on Saturday.
The camp’s chairman, Saw Htun Htun, told DVB that it was not yet safe for them to return home. “We do want to go home of course but we don’t think the reforms taking place in Burma can provide a safe enough environment for us yet. So we will raise this with Daw Suu.”
This view was supported by the Karen National Union (KNU). General Secretary Naw Zipporah Sein said: “We would like to address [Suu Kyi] about the refugee situation. The KNU does not think it now is time yet to repatriate the refugees since we are still engaged in the talks and the political issues have not been address yet.”
Tags: aung san suu kyi, migrants, refugees, thailand
Meikhtila displaced return home
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is in unique position as spokesperson for her people and the rest of the world. Her grasp of the refugee situation and how people are trapped by political situation like caught by web of a spider aka heat increase.
That heat isn’t going away but is rising and really is starting to get noticed. Suu Kyi has friends in high places- that is evident by the changes in Burma and her love of her country and people of Burma.
In my opinion,
She speaks for all of us; we are all soon to be made refugee by a near perfect storm brewing of heat where Earth’s capacity to provide will be tested.. -Earth is vulnerable to heat increase already forced by our emissions of CO2 which have totally swamped the ability of the Sea to act as a buffer and take up excess sky’s carbon by her biological ability to sequester carbon through shell formation and stuff in harmony with Nature. CO2 from industrial exploitation and land use changes has triggered in my opinion the beginnings of runaway greenhouse effect..
Earth’s ability to produce sugar from sunlight, primary ecosystem service of life is in jeopardy by pressure from consumer lifestyle and failure to link the value of money, either good or bad upon the Earth’s ecosystem services we take for granted. Policy and borders in place today, the way we live is in conflict with the Earth staying livable. How we can most affect change and and provide food and shelter to all, including hope for the future for all living things can be most easily done if countries like China, who’s own government and industrial picture is fundamentally linked to the military get the idea that it’s time for change, essentially to take a chance at a new formula. One where money’s effect on the common good and peace keeps people safe and able to live. The task of listening to what we now say..
This is a moment of inflect
It’s game on to try and change the world right now 2C..
Game:
One that links development to net effect on the…
People trust can be built by doing actual things and let them see it true. By mouth to mouth spread the news is a best advertisement of all. Reality is what make things possible. Why people talk alot instead of doing thing right and proofing it. Sample one first and two and three and four and so on. In the way that it really is possible. Why are people talk only but not doing it ?
DVB and/or Readers: Just out of curiosity, do you know by any chance who is this lady next to the The Lady – name, age, her position in NLD, etc.? Is she The Lady’s personal assistant? She is always there with the The Lady, following her like an inseparable shadow. Thank you very much.
Talking the talk.
Walking the walk.
Walking the talk.
Talking the walk.
Walk, walk. Talk, talk.
Do anything you like to promote yourself. That is the essence of politics. Reality of course is a very different matter.
Burmese refugees problems are known to everyone.
Solution?
Like the politicians of the West, faced with the eurozone crisis, SuuKyi has no solution; just hollow talks. That’s politics folks.
At the end of the day the success or failure depends on what the government does, not on SuuKyi’s hot air.
Let us hope that Burmese govt will do the right things for the sake of the people.
Unfortunately, any success attributable to the government will not be in SuuKyi’s favour. Failure is the outcome she hopes for. Hence the negativity of her comments on foreign investment. Without foreign investment, Burmese people will be stuck at the bottom. With huge foreign investment, there is a chance their lot will be improved despite what SuuKyi calls corruption. That sort of thing happenes in all newly democratised countires including Russia.
So has SuuKyi forgotten foreign investment is an injection in the circular flow of income? Has she forgotten what she had learnt in her PPE degree course at Oxford? By the way did anyone know what class of degree she got? Can’t be First Class Honours. Obama is hiding his college transcripts. Is SuuKyi doing the same?
Has anyone heard of Professor Hla Myint, formerly Senior lecturer at Oxford and Professor at LSE? And a sort of mentor to Crown Prince Shwebomin of Burma? Sorry to mention the latter. I am just researching. I am interested in his dissertation on ‘Multinationals and Third World Countries’ in the context of foreign investment; I beleive it was for his MBA in Management at Cranfield University, UK’s NO 1 for MBA. I hope my post will not be censored or moderated out of existence. As I said I am only researching.