As reforms continue to expand in Burma, so will the country’s tax base.
The Ministry of Finance and Revenue introduced a new tax system on 1 April requiring returns from the public sector and private enterprises that earn a minimal of 120,000 Kyat per month.
The new system aims to collect revenue from high earners who will pay nominal returns, while reducing the burden on residents that make little.
Maw Than, former professor at the Rangoon University of Economics and the government’s financial advisor said: “Every business enterprises should pay tax equally – [previously] companies such as [Htoo Trading Company] didn’t have to pay tax at the amount they should but now they will have to.”
According to the new system, individuals and businesses, which earn between 1 and 500,000 Kyat, will pay one percent of their earnings toward tax. The tax rate will then be increased by 1 percent for every additional 500,000 kyat that is earned. Therefore, if an individual who makes more than 20 million kyat they would pay about 20 percent of their income back in taxes.
“The problem with Burma is that the government does not receive the taxes it’s supposed to get” says Maw Than.
But under the new system, the former professor says even U Paing, who owns the Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings, would also have to pay tax.
“Because we’re reducing taxes we believe that people who have not paid tax in the past might be willing to do so now. And for people who have been paying their taxes regularly will probably pay less than they have in the past,” said U Myat Maw, director general of the ministry’s Internal Revenue Department, during an interview with the Myanmar Times.
Business owners and government workers, who in the past have been paid little but were unfairly taxed, have welcomed the new system.
Tags: economics, Ministry of Finance, money, taxes
Meikhtila displaced return home
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
so, what about property taxes like Chinese owned buildings in Yangon and Mandalay? If the government is really serious about taxes, they should have to summon all wealthy people to come up with evidences and material facts to legally own their previous properties.
I think Than Shwe alone have to pay at least US$ 50 Million in taxes as he have more than US$ 5 Billion even if he have to pay 1% of his wealth.
The question is, shall they tax from now on only to future and let all the past taxes remained unpaid.
Applause to the Ministry of Finance on working in making sure that no one including businesses and their owners are exempted from not paying due taxes. On the other, the current tax rate system can be problematic to domestic businesses who will be competing with foreign investors who will obtain tax-break incentives. If the “tax rate will then be increased by 1 percent for every additional 500,000 kyat that is earned” as mentioned in the article is true and will be implemented; then the tax rate will reach a point based on corporate income when local businesses will be paying so much tax that they will have difficulty reinvesting in their business for expansion, for Research and Development, Marketing, and especially in competing with foreign investors that will take part in Foreign Direct Investment or as a part of tax-break scheme. Liberalization of domestic market must take place only after strategic business growth plan for domestic or local businesses are set in order. If not, Foreign Direct Investment would be detrimental to the growth of small and medium sized businesses owned by our Burmese entrepreneurs. The other important thing that must be done is putting restrictions on the areas that cannot be invested by foreign investors. Last but not least the government will have to set up firm implementation in regard to conservation and preservation of natural resources (possibly the need to set up Environmental Protection Authority under Parliament’s control or as a neutral entity). Would love to hear from the others
Environmental Protection Authority
One more to bribe.