Major government overhaul underway

By AHUNT PHONE MYAT
Published: 9 February 2011

Inside view of the lower house of the new Union Parliament building in Naypyidaw (MRTV)

Two new ministries have been added to the Burmese government as part of a major overhaul of the country’s administrative system that places key military figures at the top of the pile.

Following yesterday’s parliamentary session the Ministry of the President’s Office and the Ministry of Industrial Development became the latest additions to Burma’s political landscape.

The remaining 32 have been revamped and most will come under new directorship. But the heads of four of the most prominent departments – the defence ministry, home affairs ministry, foreign affairs ministry and border affairs ministry – will be nominated solely by the commander-in-chief, Than Shwe, and then appointed by President Thein Sein.

The Ministry of Border Affairs has already been placed under the leadership of Major-General Hla Min, a senior figure in the Burmese army and former commander of the Southern Regional Military Command. The defence ministry will be headed by Lieutenant-General Ko Ko, former Chief of Bureau of Special Operations-3.

Burma’s border regions have for decades hosted conflicts between the Burmese army and armed ethnic groups that have left millions displaced. Hla Min will likely be kept busy dealing with the escalating tensions between the Burmese army and groups who refused the junta’s demands to transform into Border Guard Forces.

Retaining his position as Minister for Religious Affairs is Thura Myint Maung, the man who infamously announced on government radio in September 2007 that “action would be taken” against demonstrating monks unless they withdrew from the protests. Several were subsequently gunned down by the army.

The outcome of today’s parliamentary session will do little to appease critics of the November 2010 elections who claimed the polls were merely window-dressing, and that military rule would continue in Burma under the guise of a civilian government.

Close allies of the ruling junta make up the remaining new ministers: the country’s former police chief, Khin Yi, once a military man, has become home minister while Wunna Maung Lwin, Burma’s former ambassador to the UN, is head of foreign affairs.

Eight of the 14 people appointed as chief ministers of regional legislatures also come fresh from the military, further extending the army’s reach into the volatile border regions.

Overseeing the reshuffle is Burma’s new president, Thein Sein, a man whose military career spanned half a century before he retired last year. The former prime minister is known to be close to junta strongman Than Shwe, who in 2004 appointed him head of the National Convention which drafted the constitution that came into force with November’s election, and appeared designed to keep the generals in power.

Supporting the military figures now holding top positions in government ministries are the pro-junta MPs and army officials that dominate the new parliament, which sat for the first time last week. Respresentatives of the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), which was headed by Thein Sein, won 80 percent of seats, while a quarter of the total seats had been reserved for the military prior to voting.

Additional reporting by Francis Wade

Author:              Category: News, Politics

Comments


  1. Kanyawpo Sawpar says:

    All this has been done-deal for more than a decade, so there is no surprise of this result.

  2. timothy says:

    Yes, it is now ruled by military fascists disguised as the civilians in nice dresses. Can we call it Overhaul? People say that it is the great lie of 21st Century. 60 million innocent had just witnessed the puppet show no one wanted to know.

  3. Resident on Earth says:

    It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.
    Gandhi.

  4. PB Publico, says:

    This is all a farce.
    What else can it be. We have seen how the referrendum was held, votes manipulated, the “Constitution” and election laws enacted (decreed).
    And we have seen how the election was held, votes rigged regardless of even their own law.
    Can we expect PEACE or lack of WAR, or absence of soldiers in towns, villages and border areas, except in their barracks, throughout Burma?
    Can we expect a really people-oriented development process from this Hluttaw?
    If this Hluttaw is capable of doing all this, then the people can shed their fears of daily harassments by local officials and thugs and gun-touting officers, and pursue their fair livelihoods and a certain degree of happiness to start with.
    Violence as “Resident on Earth” may understand is not necessary and not unavoidable. Since violence, as ROE understands it, begets violence in a never-ending vicious circle, with ensuing miseries to the people not involved in the gun-fights.
    If a Muslem world, as in Egypt, can demonstrate a peaceful process under a horrid government, why can’t a population led by a Buddhist majoriity achieve peace without violence? That is, even if you have resources for guns, amunition and man power enough to face a mighty enemy for any violent action. People can fight in a non-violoent way. And Egyptions probably do no know what a Gandhian non-violence is. But they did it out of their own experience and wisdom born out of that experience. The objective is all that is important. The means may vary, but for us non-violoence is in favour.
    Let us give peace a chance in Burma. Let us try to win the love of our soldiers so that they can be neutral in case of an emergency. The most thay can do for us is to stay neutral. Remember they cannot betray their rules; they are just as much pawns and victims as any one of us people are but they are bound by rules peculiar to the military.
    So, let us make friends. Let us be friends to all!

  5. Garrett says:

    It is always problematic to take the various quotes by Gandhi, and cut them and paste them out of their original context, I often see similar partial quotations from Aung San Suu Kyi’s writings.

    In lieu of locating the original context of the qoute posted by Resident On Earth, I offer a more complete version which completes the thought.

    “It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of non-violence to cover impotence. Violence is any day preferable to impotence. There is hope for a violent man to become non-violent. There is no such hope for the impotent.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

    The main thing anyone must remember when quoting Gandhi, is that there is an entire doctrine of nonviolence behind it, which is broken down into techniques, training, and prohibited actions and lifestyles.

    It is also important to remember that nonviolence, “Satyagraha”, was meant to be used where there were large unarmed populations being persecuted and dominated by a smaller but well-armed oppressor.

    Burma, as Aung San Suu Kyi correctly realized back in 1988, was a prime candidate for a campaign of nonviolence, and on many occassions she quoted Gandhi and advocated using the most peaceful means possible to bring about true democracy. In fact, with the groundswell of enthusiasm in the urban areas and the frequently massive crowds, the mere threat of Satyagraha resulted in the 1990 elections, in escence proving the viability of what Gandhi was pointing out in the above quote.

    The problem came when the SPDC overturned the election and jailed the NLD leaders, followed by the Nobel Peace Prize which was given to Aung San Suu Kyi preemptively before she could make further calls for the nonviolent protests which would have cost thousands of lives at the hands of the the new Sheriff in town, the brutal SPDC.

    Sadly, and exactly the point of Gandhi’s comment, in the name of Peace, the Nobel Committee had decapitated the Burmese Democracy movement, and signed the death warrants of millions of ethnic minority men, women, and children who have died, and continue to die since then, and rendered impotent the formerly virile Burman majority which remains paralysed in fear and poverty to this day.

    To any Burmans who are upset to read this, I am sorry that the truth hurts. I know your lives are lived with that uncomfortable feeling that there is something important you need to do, but just remember, the price of freedom is never going to be free, and it rises with each year that passes.

    Just remember what forced the SLORC to allow a fair election in 1990, it was the courage of those heroes who stepped forward prepared to pay any price for freedom.





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other News, Politics Stories

DVB TV

Inle water shortage

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media