Burma came under pressure in the UN human rights council yesterday to speed up genuine democratic reform, as Western nations blasted “alarming” abuse and some Asian neighbours sought more change.
“The human rights situation in Myanmar [Burma] is alarming,” Sweden said in a statement to the 47-nation assembly as the council held its first regular review of Burma’s human rights record.
Western countries including Britain, France and the United States called on the military regime to free immediately more than 2,000 political prisoners, end impunity for abuse, and halt forced labour, arbitrary arrests and torture of critics.
US ambassador Eileen Donahoe warned of “ongoing, systematic violations of human rights” and expressed concern about reports of “hundreds of cases of torture of political prisoners.”
“We remain deeply concerned about the very poor state of human rights,” she added, warning that the elections last November were “neither free nor fair,” and “cannot be considered credible.”
Asian countries broadly welcomed steps towards democracy with the release of jailed opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and steered clear of overt criticism of the administration.
But many neighbouring countries and key members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), including India, Indonesia and Thailand signalled that they also wanted more progress on democratisation and avoided acknowledging the elections.
“Myanmar stands at an important crossroads in its transition to democracy,” India said in a statement.
It underlined the need for “more inclusive, broad-based and expeditious” reforms and greater efforts “to address the major human rights concerns.
Thailand sought improvements in the country’s laws to “promote greater accountability” as well as more efforts to engage ethnic groups and deal with human rights. “We urge the authorities in Myanmar to work to consolidate the gains achieved and ensure further positive developments,” said Thai envoy Kanita Sapphaisal.
MPs returned to Parliament in Burma’s capital Naypyidaw
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
The Burma junta chief will not be moved by good sense and strong rhetoric, unless backed and followed up by actions that have direct impact on him, (let me repeat) on him, not on the people or the country; he does not care abou the people he rules.
For instance, the UN and its agencies, necessarily supported by China and India, deny him or his proxy to be head of state or government by denying recognition of the government formed as a result of 2010 election. But Burma will always be on the agenda of every agency concerned with human rights and crimes aganst humanity.
Difficult, but not impossible.
Failing that, for reason of civil unrest added to the perpetual civil wars, and massive suffering on the part of the people, send in a UN Peace Keeping force, supported by major countries as above, to keep peace and normal human activities. Difficult, but not impossible.
A concept that a government that cannot maintain peace and stability, in addition to massive complaints of human right violation and crimes against humanity, is inapt and a dnger to regional or wider world order and therefore should be removed, forceably if need be. The matter of a world government, stronger than the UN. Too far fetched. May be, but worth lookiing into.
All the above actions must be supported by a majority vote by the people of Burma, polled in a way acceptable by the world community.
Of course, the above thesis is based on a most hypothetical situation of mercy, love and kindness, honesty and integrity of the world leaders. If some of them lack those virtues, then it is too bad for countries like Burma and its people.
You know what? Everybody has their own different opinion on Burma. I don’t think UN will do anything about burma or any other asian countries because UN is controlled by Americans. UN will only get involve if some country is attacking U.S. or Europe. They are all a bunch of hypocrite. The only thing they’re good at is blaming the issue on some other country like China or Russia. If they really care about this issue they would have done something about it already. It’s been over 20 years and nothing’s being done. That S.O.B Than Shwe is going to die of old age and nothing’s beiing done. On the other hand I think Burmese people should WAKE UP and do something about it. I know every body loves Aung San Suu Kyi but I feel that she is leading the Burmese people into the wrong direction. This is not the time for hunger strike or hold each other hands and sing koom ba ya. This is the time to fight. I mean foget all the help we will never get from UN or US. They’re all a bunch of chickens. I think we will see Democracy in Burma after Than Shwe or Aung San Suu Kyi dies and hopefully somebody with good sense of direction will lead Burma into the right path. Right now we don’t need Aung San Suu Kyi. We need someone like her father. We miss you A Phay
The whole world is skating on thin ice – and it’s starting to crack.. Without actions to protect human rights everywhere what chance does the Earth have that people will get governance in place that respects and protects Earth’s environmental systems let alone the possibility of building out infrastructure that truly supports civilization.. Poor or desperate conditions will become even more commonplace unless help is given to people in need.. The water below that ice, how deep is it, like maybe all that would result is a small economic recession or perhaps a discovery that global warming isn’t real.. More like bottomless quicksand of a global overheat and an environmental systems collapse including that of the primary biologic system responsible for use of sunlight in the support of life processes..
So does it matter what happens in far off lands. It matters like there is no tomorrow without good will for others and willingness to protect others.