Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Burma ‘ready for ethical investment’: Suu Kyi

By HANNA HINDSTROM
Published: 27 January 2012
Burma ‘ready for ethical investment’: Suu Kyi thumbnail
Aung San Suu Kyi pictured addressing last year's Davos summit via video feed (Reuters)

Aung San Suu Kyi today sketched out a blueprint for future foreign investment in Burma that would prioritise innovation and an understanding of the sensitivities of the business environment there, in an address to the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The opposition icon, who has for long lobbied overseas governments to enforce blockades on companies operating in Burma, urged the forum of leaders to support Burma’s transition to a model Southeast Asian economy. She acknowledged that the content of her address this year contrasted sharply with that of the last WEF.

“Last year I spoke of the challenges that Burma was facing, our missed opportunities, our fundamental need for political stability, national reconciliation and rule of law, that we may be able to achieve genuine democratisation, human development and economic growth,” she said. “A year on I can say that we have taken some steps towards meeting those challenges.”

She praised Minister for Industry 2 U Soe Thane’s decision to attend this year’s meeting of business and world leaders as a sign of positive change taking place in Burma. Her speech also marks a significant shift in policy for Suu Kyi’s National League of Democracy, which has previously denounced foreign investment in Burma.

“We wish to create a political, social and economic environment that will bring ethical, new and innovative investments to our country. We would like to draw up our blueprint for a sustainable new model economy with a view to the future needs of our globe, social and environmental concerns, woven into food, water and energy needs.”

Earlier this week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) applauded Burma’s reforms, suggesting the country could become the “next economic frontier in Asia”. Despite being a resource rich country, Burma remains the least developed in Southeast Asia after decades of diplomatic isolation and economic mismanagement.

Suu Kyi reiterated the need for Burma to hold free and fair elections and initiate political and legal reform, as well as new fiscal and monetary measures. But she expressed optimism that soon Burma would be able to play a more significant role in the global economy.

“I hope the fruit of our labours will contribute towards to a closer, positive links between our domestic economy and global developments,” she said.

She was unable to attend the Davos meeting in person. It remains unclear whether the government would allow her back in the country should she decide to travel – a concern that has prevented her from leaving Burma since 1988. Moreover, the NLD is busy preparing for 1 April by-elections, in which the party is contesting 48 parliamentary seats.

The NLD has endorsed a recent decision by the EU to begin easing sanctions on Burma – a move that has divided opinion. Critics argue that such a poorly targeted policy is ineffective, even that it hurts Burmese people and hinders much-needed international aid from reaching the country. But with the government dominated by former or serving military men and attacks on ethnic minorities ongoing, proponents of sanctions say they should remain, but be finely-tuned to better target hawkish government officials and business cronies.

Tags: , , , , ,

Author:              Category: Economics, News

Comments


  1. Soe Thane says:

    Because of her stupid sanctions policy, Burma will not be ready for “ethical investment” for another 20 years. She will learn the hard way. She will get into government, but sanctions will mean that there is zero left to build on. She will be 90 years old before Burma can really change.

  2. With carefully and step by step becouse Than Shwe,Maung Aye and Khing Nyunt?????????????????????????????

  3. U Tha Phru says:

    Development projects in Myanmar shall be reviewed and assessed to determine whether it is in the overall and long term national interest.

    Example Dawei port can be developed under SEZ scheme directly under the ministry or any agency under UN or World bank. The infra structure can be funded by such agencies or institutional funds and the industries,power IPP, ports, warehousing etc can be given to individual companies under FDI. This shall be the rational way instead of a bankrupt international company seeking fund on behalf everywhere knocking the doors unsuccessfully due to bad reputation and corrupt practice

  4. Wong Aung says:

    As DASSK mentioned, political stability, national reconciliation and rule of law are needed for genuine democracy, and they will in turn ensure the protection of our people and environment as new investments flood Burma. The current fighting in Kachin and Northern Shan state are very obvious examples of the hazards of FDI, and in the case of the Shwe Gas Pipelines Project—companies are fueling the conflict. Today, as the Burmese regime attempts to secure this multi-billion dollar projects,they have displaced thousands and committed other atrocities like, force labors, tortures and raping local women . As long as the Shwe Gas Pipelines Project continues, its consortium of companies is complicit in any abuses the regime commits. And until the foundations of democracy in Burma exist—political stability, national reconciliation, rule of law, and accountability and transparency mechanisms, SGP and other mega-development projects like it should be suspended and investors should demand it.

  5. Tettoe Aung says:

    Just because the content of Daw Suu’s speech sharply contrasted the speech she gave to the forum last year it doesn’t mean that there are no challenges ahead. How can one expects his or her property rights without an appropriate ‘legislative’ environment? Easing of sanctions is one thing but ‘investing’ is another matter where it should be both beneficial to the investor and the people of the country. While the main players who benefited from the spoils of ‘economic cronyism’ who are to be allowed to walk free with the loot they have gathered during their ‘reign of terror’ can we safely say that it’s time for Burma to be ready for ‘ethical investment’? I hope so but without any form of ‘restorative justice’ put in place will money and wealth be able to wipe out the torture and trauma that many people have suffered under the successive military regime?

  6. Tom Tun says:

    Without fixing labour practices and labour law, how can we say that any investment will be ETHICAL? Does Burma regulates minimum wages? Does Burma have retirement pension plan? Does Burma have employer responsibilities toward his or her employees’ safety? How about worker compensation standard in Burma? Bringing the investors and make the regulation later is entrapment. It is not ETHICAL. Burma urgently need to develop but rushing to get there without doing important facts will only hurt the Burmese people.

  7. tocharian says:

    Is the Chinese pipeline and the Chinese naval base in Kyaukphru ethical? What is Suu Kyi’s and NLD’s position on that? NLD is officially now running in by-elections! Democracy only works if there is transparency of information and a clear platform of policies. Otherwise this new “opening up” reform politics will only benefit the top 1% (the oligarchy) in Burma (as usual lol)

  8. Cane says:

    Aung San Suu Kyi is promoted as Beggar by the smart militray generals.

    She is not smart but idiot. Thsi could be because she is Burmese-Karen . Karen have only one ear . not pair.





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other Economics, News Stories

DVB TV

Into the Current

MOST READ STORIES

DVB Election News Mapping
 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media