In some of 2010′s most compelling images, Burma’s Aung San Suu Kyi emerged from her home after years in detention and an empty chair marked the absence of Liu Xiaobo from his Nobel prize ceremony.
Asia’s two human rights martyrs serve as compelling reminders that a region celebrated for its economic vibrancy also harbours some of the world’s most intractable and brutal regimes.
And despite outrage from foreign governments, and an increasing awareness among Asia’s billions who have embraced the Internet and social media, the region’s dictatorships and corrupt regimes show no sign of bending.
“There seems to have been a downturn in respect for human rights,” said Dave Mathieson from the Asia division of Human Rights Watch. “There’s been a more sophisticated backlash against global human rights norms.”
Countries that had once argued that western notions of democracy were not in keeping with “Asian values” were now instead muting criticism by staging parodies of the democratic process, he said.
“A lot of states talk about democracy and say — at least we’re holding elections, it’s progress. When of course most of them are illiberal processes that just support the status quo.”
Burma’s ruling generals held the impoverished country’s first elections in two decades in November, ignoring complaints that barring Suu Kyi’s opposition party rendered the ballot illegitimate.
The 65-year-old democracy icon last month walked out of her lakeside home where she has been locked up for 15 of the past 21 years, smiling and in high spirits, but her future remains precarious and at the mercy of the junta.
In Sri Lanka, January elections were held after the island’s long-running civil war against Tamil Tiger rebels ended in an onslaught that has drawn allegations of war crimes.
President Mahinda Rajapakse was re-elected by a huge margin over his opponent, former army chief Sarath Fonseka. He alleged he was the victim of massive fraud and was then promptly arrested and jailed.
Grisly new photos emerged last month of piles of dead bodies and execution-style killings allegedly taken during the final stages of the war, during which up to 30,000 ethnic Tamil civilians perished, according to several rights watchdogs.
Burma and Sri Lanka both count as a key ally China, whose own rights record was on display when jailed dissident Liu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in absentia in a ceremony Beijing attacked as “political theatre”.
China mounted a fearsome response to the Nobel committee’s decision, pressuring around 20 countries to boycott the ceremony and blacking out live broadcasts of the event by CNN and the BBC in China.
On Tuesday, Liu marked his 55th birthday in a prison in northeast China, prompting renewed calls from rights groups for the Nobel laureate’s immediate release from an 11-year jail sentence for breaching anti-sedition laws.
Asia Society executive vice-president Jamie Metzl, in an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, accused China of underpinning some of the worst behaviour on the globe.
“Wherever human rights are massively abused today, China is the main protector of the abusing government,” he said, pointing to regimes in Sudan, Burma, North Korea, Zimbabwe and Iran.
“Because China helps protect these regimes — and often benefits commercially, in the form of deals for natural resources — international efforts to protect human rights generally have no net effect on the abusing regime’s actions.”
Metzl said that while “China’s rapid rise has had many positive implications”, it had also derailed a half-century of global efforts to codify and enforce the principles of universal human rights.”
The Asian Human Rights Commission in an annual report urged regional nations to meet the rising aspirations of their people, and improve “the protection mechanisms for civil rights and economic, social and cultural rights”.
For many ordinary people this is not just a political debate, but a day-to-day struggle against police brutality, violence against women, poverty, religious discrimination and inadequate justice systems.
“All throughout Asia there are clear signs of the people being more aware of their rights and they are making great efforts to improve the enjoyment of their rights,” the commission said.
“The hope for a better future lies in these initiatives by the people themselves. However, the government response to these initiatives is wholly inadequate.”
Tags: human rights
MPs returned to Parliament in Burma’s capital Naypyidaw
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
The recent global recession has everything to do with multinational corporation, globalization and its financial institution. Exploiting the weaker nations becomes more legal and ethnical nowadays. The alarming rates of unemployment among the superpowers have no solution or regulation at all. The legislation and its agents are weak and corrupt. The world is at the pity of less than 1%of its population. The bite of “invisible hand” started to swell.
The mentality gap between the rising powers in the east like China and India, and the aging super powers like US and EU left a loophole for the third-world dictators to find a way to hide their restless human rights violations by letting these powers to exploit their natural resources and cheap labors for their protection in turn. Thus, the repression and oppression over the defenseless people around the world become more lethal for dictators to hang on the power causing more and more of the abuses and violations of international standard human right.
On part of the leviathan of the world so called UN, from Sudan to Burma nothing ever has done to solve the humanitarian crisis and human rights situation effectively. The institution itself and its complicated red-tape have no longer suitable to solve today world’s crisis. The wrestling of the powerbrokers and the power-players to approach the trouble spots has mere impact. The current leader of the UN, who is not even fit for such job, named Mr. Ban Ki-Moon’s weak and ineffective approach to tackle the global affairs has not just hurt the nations in trouble spots but left the human rights violations out in the open.
In our case, Ban obviously did not understand the mentality of the regime in Burma. For Than Shwe, disregarding Ban’s current position, thought him as a South Korean is just another one of those Asian diplomats, who never deserve any special treat for any reason other than formal protocol. And, Than Shwe with his stone-age mentality, don’t give a damn about the Asian Secretary General of UN. Ban himself knows that he is not suits well in the job.
In support of our view, we quote a man saying, “Evidently Ban Ki-moon thinks he’s still Korean foreign minister and he can’t risk his good standing with Uzbekistan’s dictator,” who was jailed by the paranoid Uzbekistan’s regime for helping Maxim Popov, handling UN-funded material on Aids prevention.
The statement was right. Ban himself doesn’t seem to understand how important his job is. His relationship with Burma’s generals never changed; the rights and opportunities of Korean business always triumph over human rights. Going on record as secretary-general, it is crystal clear that Ban Ki Moon is not even fit for the job. Moreover, he is a disgrace for the organization.
Evidently, Ban’s remark regarding Daewoo’s Shwe Gas project in Burma as a “WIN-WIN” has outraged human rights advocates and Burmese exiles who have grave concerns over the devastating environmental impact of the project, which they predict would provide billions in foreign currency for the Burmese regime to buy weapons to use against its own people. Ban certainly doesn’t have sufficient diplomatic skills for the job, much less act accordingly as well. The existing global crisis could get worse under his leadership.
His outcry for the releases of the prisoners of conscience in Burma, and his call for the election to be inclusive have no teeth for Burma junta’s respect at all. He still has failed to denounce the results of the “sham elections” in 2010 because of China that is the only straw for him to get elected for the second term.
Thus, we have to live on at the mercy of the mercy of our own dictators helplessly from now.
We can only agree with U Hlawin`s comments which is too truthful to be ignore; too fearlessly stated to be disregard and so good to hit the life line of helpless Ban Ki Moon. It is cruel world which favour the oppressor and ignore the plight of billions` poor communities. We are waiting for blood bath. We are at the edge of Nuclear bomb blast. One day the bomb will be ignited by the sorry person, then we all will finish altogether. That day will come. In the mean time, carry on with this unfair world.