Ethnic leaders have met with released opposition icon Aung San Suu Kyi in a bid to reignite a major push for autonomy for Burma’s myriad ethnic groups.
The convening of a second Panglong Conference more than 60 years after the historic 1947 meeting has been made a priority by Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) party, which until its dissolution earlier this year had been the strongest opposition to the majority Burman junta.
Suu Kyi was accompanied on Monday by senior members of the NLD, including deputy Tin Oo and elder Win Tin, at the party’s Rangoon headquarters, where she met with key figures from various ethnic groups in Burma.
“Daw Aung San Suu Kyi discussed the particulars of convening a 21st Century Panglong Conference, and how to…bring more unity and confidence among all ethnicities,” said Tin Oo.
Also present were members of the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD), the Zomi National Congress leader Pu Cint Sian Than, Htaung Co Thang of Committee Representing the People’s Parliament (CRPP), as well as Nai Ngwe Thein, chairman of the Mon National League for Democracy party, and Thar Bann from the Arakan League for Democracy.
It was Suu Kyi’s father, General Aung San, who as the head of Burma’s interim government in 1947 brought together Shan, Chin and Kachin leaders to discuss autonomy, but then as part of a wider push for independence from British rule.
Aung San however was killed later that year and no further progress on ethnic rights was made. Around 135 minority groups live in Burma, predominantly in the country’s volatile border regions which have hosted decades-long conflicts against the ruling junta.
Tin Oo said that Suu Kyi’s tabling of “Panglong 2”, as it’s come to be known, was welcomed by the participants at the meeting, who would reconvene at the weekend for a wider discussion.
MPs returned to Parliament in Burma’s capital Naypyidaw
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
Good leadership Suu Kyi!
Keep on the meeting issue on the second Pang long conference. This is the only way to establish the real the federal system and people of Burma would live in peace as well as developed nations in the future.
Suu Kyi is taking after her father, following every inch of steps of Aung San’s. She’ll stand up for the truth, justice in order to protect each citizen against tyranny. Suu Kyi symbolizes a sign of peace, a mark of distinction, and a beacon of unity in the fight for freedom.
This is the crux of the Burmese problem and should be encorage. The army came into power in 1962 because the elected civilian government cannot solve the ethnic grievences if otherwise there will be no struggle for democracy. Hence this is the most important of all the problems
K Win
Indepedence was given to Union of Burma. Not to the Bamahs alone.Bamahs cannot snatch the whole country like a bully. UN must blow the whistle, and give a level ground. Canada
OK,what is stand for Bamahs?Independence was received by fighting all citizens of union of Myanmar.Then why are you still want to get autonomy?If you really want to get peace & progress,let stay together and work hard,No need to ask for federal state and autonomy.I am quite sure that federal state and autonomy can not make peace and progress,only civil war will eventually come up. Because,now a day,all the 135 ethnics are dispersed and settled down in all the state,I am also one of them.So I will not accept and may need to fight for it.
We want an autonomy because we don’t want another Burmese government to tell us what we can and cannot do in our community when they don’t even live in our community. We don’t want them to destroy our schools and ban us from speaking and learning our language, which is necessary in our community. Though people may disperse all over, a high number of each ethnic still live in their own state with their own history of settling there and their ethnic lived there for centuries. Evey community has different needs. If you don’t speak a language of an ethnic and go into their area, how are you going to help them?You will need to learn their language because they cannot understand you because you speak a language that is barely used in their community. You will need a translator if you want to help them. Every ethnic in Burma is different and the cultures are diverse but are you going to make one culture(the dominant) to make a decision on a minority people when they don’t even know what are the needs for them. Federal states or autonomy was supposed to represent the Union of Burma but it was never practiced. It has always been a dictator. Each ethnic is very strong, and if you are going to fight against it, you are fighting for no change and only the same situation as it is and it will stay the same because the dictator holds all the power to every ethnic area and there was no benefits toward the people because they have no autonomy government that will help them for their own state. The dictator uses all to himself and share nothing to ethnic areas. Universities were built in central Burma but I don’t see any in other states. I feel that if we don’t have autonomy government, we will be unheard in our community just like what we are right now.
Why do we have to get permission from this modern Hitler for anything when they never ask permission from us whether they can practice the injustice actions of coming to our community and force people to do labor, be porters, rape ethnic women, and kill people. At the least if there is an autonomy government, there will be laws that will protect us from these and that there will be laws that prevent them from building infrastructures such as dams that will destroy the only necessity that the ethnic people have been depending for a living for centuries. I don’t want a person who is supposed to be my government but does not represent my state to come in and build a dam and relocate me to somewhere else. I am human and I want a government that live in my area and state and understand my culture and language and knows the need of my area. I want a law that will protect me against what has been happening for decades.
How would you feel if you are a Burmese and have an ethnic person coming to your area and rape your woman or kill your parents? Don’t you want a law in where you live to protect you???
This is my opinion and I am not favoring any groups. I just want justice and law that can protect people in their area to live the life they want to live without fearing of threats from army.
Federal system is best for Myanmar. All corrupt government officials accept bribe and rule state with injustice. They broke the law, import a lot of illegal foreign aliens for just 100 USD per head and they manage state issues without consent from originals. They sold out forest to Chinese, allow Bengali to enter Myanmar by just accept 100 USD bribe. States must be ruled by the ethnic races living there, not Bamar. Myanmar is not Bamar Land, just for notice.
Well, for crying out for loud,this issue need to be solved a long, long time ago. Neither the majority Bama nor the minorities Shan, Kachin, Kayin, Chin, Kayah, Wa and so on have benefited from the military regime of U Ne Win or his successor Saw Maung and Than Shwe. In U Nu’s era they promised ‘Bama takyat, Shan takyat’ but the promise have never been fulfilled. It is worst now, neither Bama nor Shan nor Kachin, Kayin or someone else have none but all for Than Shwe, Aung Thaung, Maung Thaung and their lackeys. We ethnic are human too. At least Daw Suu has some sense of social justice.
Only Daw Suu is serious about ethnic issues in Burma but most of all NLD elders are as worst and ignorant as SPDC. That’s why US/Europe /UN could not anything for Burma because Suu Kyi only moving in the right direction toward democracy.
Union of Burma should be a nation of eight feferal states ( Kachin, Kayah, Karen, Chin, Mon,Rakhine,Shan and Burma }
Mandalay should be the nation’s capital as Rangoon is part of Karen autonomous zone. Naypyidaw should be forfeited and put off. All military officials should be imprisoned for life. Civilians who are helping military regime should be executed and all properties amassed by military officials and their relatives, lackeys and stooges should be forfeited to the state.
China should not be excluded just because of their relationhip to SPDC. Myanmar arm force should be changed bottom up.
Suu Kyi is British and American Plant in Myanmar — her only agenda is to get the USA/UK into Myanmar. All this talk of freedom for Myanmar is motivated by that agenda. Unfortunately for her, neighbouring powers have other concerns and she is an inconvenience/nuisance from that perspective.