N Korea specialist eyed as Burma envoy

By FRANCIS WADE
Published: 9 June 2010

Eric John is currently US ambassador to Thailand (Reuters)

The US must appoint an envoy to Burma “without delay” in light of allegations that the pariah state is developing a nuclear weapons programme and has traded military hardware with North Korea, a senior US senator has said.

In a letter yesterday to US secretary of state Hillary Clinton, Jim Webb, who last week cancelled a trip to Burma after the allegations surfaced, called on Washington to examine “objectively and factually…and in a timely manner” the allegations.

He said that the appointment of an envoy was a requirement of the 2008 Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE Act, but that the position remained empty. An envoy, he said, would promote “multilateral sanctions, direct dialogue with the [Burmese junta] and democracy advocates, and support for nongovernmental organizations operating in Burma and neighbouring countries”.

The US ambassador to Thailand, Eric John, was given a “strong recommendation” by Webb as someone fit for this role, largely for his knowledge of East Asian affairs, which includes “long experience in dealing with the North Korean regime on issues that might be similar to those we will be facing in Burma”.

The US appears to take the warming relationship between Burma and North Korea as a real threat, but has remained coy about the extent of its knowledge on the relationship: Webb mentioned in his letter reports about a weapons shipment from North Korea to Burma this year, which the US is believed to have known about, but added that the state department was yet to publicly clarify the details.

State department spokesperson Philip Crowley told reporters yesterday that he and Clinton hadn’t yet seen the letter, but asserted that Burma remains a country “of significance” to the US. However he declined to answer whether the appointment of an envoy was a viable option for the US, saying only that Washington was “watching closely” the relationship with North Korea.

Part of the reason for US concern is its waning influence in Southeast Asia, which has allowed China to strengthen economic and political ties with, among others, Burma and North Korea. Huge gas sales to China have largely financed Burma’s weapons programme and have supported clandestine trade with Pyongyang, which appears to have evaded a tight UN arms embargo.

In his letter, Webb lamented the silence from the state department regarding recent weapons exports from North Korea to Burma; it is alleged that a ship offloaded cargo at a Rangoon port around April this year, although more specific details have not been released.

He said that he and his staff “worked for weeks to seek public clarification of this allegation, but the State Department provided none”. But as the results of a five-year investigation by DVB into Burma’s nuclear ambitions and its ties with North Korea began to surface last week, Webb cancelled what would have been his second visit to Burma.

Author:              Category: Elections, News, Politics

Comments


  1. Denys Goldthorpe says:

    How many more of the Burmese people will have to die at the hands of this illegal government in Burma? Now the threat from Thitsaphout Than Shwe is far greater than it ever was it now involves a very real danger to world peace. Than Shwe has placed every man woman and child under threat of annihilation. Let’s forget about appointing some envoy and consider the very real threat this criminal Than Shwe poses. A military strike against Than Shwe would be of a much better option and by far better for the long suffering people of Burma and the rest of the world.

  2. ko lay says:

    dont have all negative thinking about general than shwe.there is good n bad side of him n his army junta.nothing can change with the appointment of any new envoy.for change all people have to be united n revolt the army. people have to be brave, dont have to run with few killing my the army during protest. need to struggle.cant get change with few brave people inside n outside myanma.If cant revolt, than cooperate with the junta is best for all people living inside the country.

  3. Derek Tonkin says:

    The recent revelations by Major Sai, which I accept at their face value, though they need better “political” interpretation, have however debunked sensationalist stories last year by Desmond Ball and Phil Thornton (Mizzima of 5 August 2009) that the Russians were building a nuclear 10 MW reactor at Myaing, that the North Koreans were doing the same with a “secret” 10 MW reactor at Naung Laing and that a bomb could be produced every year from 2014. We now know that the Russians have declined to go ahead with the provision of a nuclear reactor at Myaing and that the North Koreans are not involved in building a nuclear reactor at Naung Laing either. There may well be a lot of experimental, low level indigenous nuclear activity in progress which would only make sense, as Robert Kelley has said, in the context of nuclear weaponry, but I am beginning to wonder if Nay Pyi Taw may not be altogether displeased that “leaks” have occurred. “The Irrawaddy” today reports that some 200 military officers may have defected in recent years, some with overseas training. Yet none of them seem to have brought out any nuclear secrets.

    I also notice that a senior Chinese military delegation is currently visiting military establishments and institutes at Pyin Oo Lwin and elsewhere.

    US Assistant Secretary Kurt Campbell spoke in the recent Al Jazeera programme of signs of Burmese “flirtation” with North Korea on military matters. However, he did not say whether this “flirtation” was related to conventional or nuclear weaponry. The situation remains that evidence of any nuclear cooperation with North Korea remains only “anecdotal” (Robert Kelley, DVB consultant), that no nuclear reactor has been supplied to Burma by either Russia or North Korea, that a locally built nuclear reactor is little more than a pipe-dream and that the vast array of underground tunnels and bunkers built in recent years is not thought to house any nuclear facilities. Whatever agreements and understandings on military matters may have been concluded with North Korea in the past, the continuance of any such cooperation would today be a breach of UN Security Council Resolutions 1718 and 1874 – any cooperation at all. But Major Sai’s revelations provide no evidence that such undoubted cooperation in the past is still continuing. That doesn’t mean to say that it isn’t. As Major Sai said, the Generals would love to have an ICBM, but then so too would North Korea whose most recent attempt at an ICBM launch failed after only 42 seconds.

  4. PB Publico says:

    I think Mr Webb was only trying to excuse himself for his part in befriending the abominable Burma junta.
    We don’t need an envoy but CIA agets all along the borders with China, Thailand, Bangladesh and of course, India.
    Can any body take away this Idi Ahmin of Burma?





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other Elections, News, Politics Stories

DVB TV

Meikhtila displaced return home

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media