British prime minister Gordon Brown has labelled the Burmese election laws “restrictive” and “unfair”, and has called for an urgent arms embargo on Burma, perhaps the final and most potent feather left in the sanctions bucket.
He also claims to have “written to the UN Secretary General to call for an urgent meeting in New York to discuss these developments”, although bizarrely Ban Ki-moon reportedly did not receive the letter.
At the same time representatives of Burma’s military were convening with other members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in the Philippines.
With no sense of irony, the junta’s foreign minister, Nyan Win, lectured the gathering on tolerance. “I hardly need to stress the importance of harbouring mutual respect among people of different faiths”, he said, and needless to say the Rohingya delegate in the Burmese team got lost at sea.
With an accurate reading of history and military imprecision in the art of international relations, meanwhile, Nyan Win stated that “if we fail to show respect and discriminate against other religions, conflicts and tensions among peoples will linger on. We fully agree that tolerance is a fundamental value of international relations.”
The Manila meeting of the NAM also petitioned Ban Ki-moon, this time over the good offices interference in domestic affairs. It stated that the UN does not have jurisdiction over human rights in a sovereign state.
That position was clearly rejected by the Human Rights Watch, who said in a statement on the group’s website that the UN “should not delay the setting up of an international inquiry to address possible war crimes and crimes against humanity in Burma.”
Nyan Win is likely to meet the Philippines foreign minister and NAM host, Alberto Romulo, on Wednesday, where Romulo will likely criticise the junta for effectively lying to all its neighbours after promising ‘free and fair elections’, and then not delivering them.
Romulo made a statement to the same effect on Monday, saying that election laws were “contrary to the roadmap to democracy that they have pledged to [Association of Southeast Asian Nations] and to the world”.
The Philippines, like Gordon Brown, has repeatedly called for the release of prime minster-elect Aung San Suu Kyi, but at the UN Human Rights Council, Burma and co-hermit-in-chief, North Korea, defended their “rights to sovereignty”, with China also wading in to defend the two pariahs.
Tags: Elections, gordon, laws, UN
MPs returned to Parliament in Burma’s capital Naypyidaw
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
Gordon Brown feels passionately about Burma. With Foreign Secretary David Miliband in China, he seems to have fired off a message to Ban Ki-moon without consulting the Foreign Office who would have told him not to waste his time on an arms embargo as the Russians and Chinese are supplying all that is needed, and the Tatmadaw has recently re-equipped. As it is, nobody quite knows what has happened to the message, nor what it contains. Lobby correspondents in New York are having a field day, and even the Beijing People’s Daily couldn’t resist making a crack. This is not the way to conduct an effective policy on Burma. The rest of the EU will want to know what is happening and why he has acted in this strange way. But that is Gordon Brown, who seems to lose control every time he hears Burma mentioned. His heart is in the right place, but he needs to take a grip on himself if his Burma policy is to be coherent and effective.
Gordon Brown is right but the UN is far too slow to do right things in right time. Don’t know why. Something is surely wrong with the UN too. Paying much attention to China? China is just making business with the junta for itself but the ones who suffer are the Burmese. Clear enough. Right? Why so hesitating to remove that regime like in Iraq. Yeah! Not exactly the same situation with Iraq but surely the same in the face of human rights abuse which is very very poor inside Burma. Forget about negotiation and putting more sanctions on Burma. You are making the public suffer longer. Just slam the regime at its face by making them straight hard way. Who you are dealing with is the military junta not civilian government. They don’t know about negotiation. See what they are doing to ethnic groups? Negotiating? Yeah! I think you all have ears good enough to hear gun shots and bombing in those places. Yes! Do the same thing to the junta. It is fair. Right? Yeah! China may not want this way just because its business is inside Burma. It just wants to defend its own business not the Burmese public. The UN must be free. Not like now. No more. You see the scene. You know what to do. So why not doing it? Afraid of China? Rising super power? Put it aside in the face of human rights. Stand firm, the UN. Where is your commitment now? You are still really doing good and right things for your memeber? Where is your prestige now? Gone with China? Not the wind, I guess. Hmm! Whoo! Very disappointing!