Bangladesh’s lose – lose strategy on the Rohingya

By MARK FARMANER
Published: 6 August 2012
Rohingya women stand in front of their makeshift home in an unregistered Rohingya refugee camp in Teknaf
Rohingya women stand in front of their makeshift home in an unregistered Rohingya refugee camp in Teknaf on 17 June 2012. (Reuters)

If officials from Bangladesh’s NGO Affairs Bureau and Foreign Ministry were to have a meeting tomorrow about how to deal with the current crisis with the Rohingya, and set the criteria that they wanted to cause maximum damage to Bangladesh’s international reputation, cause maximum suffering for the Rohingya, break international law, cause Bangladeshi citizens to miss out on development opportunities, and be completely ineffective at developing a long term strategy dealing with the root cause of the problem, they wouldn’t have to change a single policy that Bangladesh is already following today.

What is surprising is that despite this policy failing for the past twenty years and beyond, rather than reassessing the policy and changing direction, Bangladesh’s response to the current crisis has been to adopt an even more extreme and hard-line version of its failed policies. Last week’s order to three international aid agencies, MSF, Action Against Hunger and Muslim Aid, to stop proving aid to Rohingya refugees, in the full knowledge of the suffering and possible deaths that such an order will cause, will not solve any of the problems Bangladesh faces with Rohingya refugees.

Rohingya people are not going to Bangladesh because they are drawn by the prospect of luxury refugee camps. Rohingya people flee to Bangladesh because for decades in Burma they have faced severe human rights abuses at the hands of one of the most brutal dictatorships in the world. And more people are fleeing now because the military-backed government, facing the prospect of having its political party wiped out by the National League for Democracy at the next elections, is playing the nationalist card in order to try to build support, and is targeting the Rohingya as an unpopular Muslim ethnic minority.

The root cause of Rohingya refugees arriving in Bangladesh is the persecution they face, and also the long-term refusal of the government to allow international agencies full and free access to assist the Rohingya. Preventing refugees in Bangladesh from receiving aid doesn’t address this problem. Devoting significant military police and security resources to trying to turn back refugees doesn’t solve this problem. What is needed is a political solution.

Bangladesh could win significant international plaudits and favours by allowing Rohingya refugees’ entry to Bangladesh, and negotiating a fully-fledged international aid operation, funded internationally, to assist those refugees. It could use the goodwill created by such a gesture to secure humanitarian and development funding for the whole border region, transforming the lives of local Bangladeshi citizens.  There would be no significant cost to the government of Bangladesh, and there would be significant benefits for Bangladeshi people and the reputation of Bangladesh.

At the same time Bangladesh should begin a diplomatic initiative to tackle the root causes of the problem, which is Burma’s treatment of the Rohingya. It could mobilise support from the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, which includes the governments of Indian and Sri-Lanka, both close to Burma’s military-backed government.  The current high profile of the Rohingya issue gives Bangladesh the opportunity to enlist the support of not just western countries, but a much broader alliance in international forums such as the Human Rights Council and United Nations General Assembly, which can be used to apply pressure on the government of Burma to stop persecution of the Rohingya and reform the laws which render them stateless.

There is no quick fix or easy solution to the refugee crisis or the political problems at its root cause, which makes it all the more important that Bangladesh change policy now to try to find a more moral and humanitarian, and more effective strategy, to address this crisis. Bangladesh has so far followed a lose-lose policy on the Rohingya. It loses, the Rohingya lose. It’s time for a win-win policy.

-Mark Farmaner is Director of Burma Campaign UK.

Tags: , , , ,

Author:              Category: Analysis

Comments


  1. A. Khan says:

    Problem with the current Bangladesh government is that it is perhaps one of the most short-sighted, egotistical, unthinking and heartless government that the world has seen in recent years!

  2. Abdul_UK says:

    All these “pledges” are short-term solutions that very few developed nations follow through on when the cameras are off. There are already 800,000 Rohingya refugees in BD who live in terrible conditions in this highly densely-populated impoverished nation. Instead of hand-waving about how they will “aid” Bangladesh, why not do something tangible and provide these Rohingya with safe asylum to more developed countries? Because that would require LONG-TERM work, something none of these nations doing the pledging are willing to go through with. Why not focus on the source of the problem; the ethnic violence going on in Burma daily and attempt to sort it out first-hand? Oh that’s right, it messes with the situation of opening trade with Burma. Much easier to allow them to slaughter these refugees and talk in a high-and-mighty tone to Bangladesh.

  3. kryon says:

    Truth is Bangladesh had already been losing much before the new rohingya crisis.The whole policy of Burma oppressing the Rohingya population is to send them to Bangladesh.Already they have 300K Rohingya in this overpopulated country.Infact this strategy of Bangladesh will actually benefit the Rohingyas because now more focus will be put on their plight.Had Bangladesh accepted the new influx of Rohingyas,the world would have forgotten about the crisis much before since they are more interested in tapping the potential new frontier of Myanmar.Their greed will prevail more than their humanity.Even now we can see how the world is completely ignoring the rohingya plight.So since the world doesn’t care how can you expect Bangladesh with its limited resources do more than it has already done?The fact that these charities are operating for more than 10 years implies that they have completely failed to rehabilitate the rohingyas.Even now they live in dilapidated conditions with a high birthrate and fundamentalist and uneducated mindset.These charities have failed to provide decent education,better health information and lastly the general knowledge of their homeland.Now they know more about Bangladesh than their own country.These charities are actually killing their dreams of returning to their homeland,earn a decent living and gain knowledge about their culture and their country.Bangladesh economy is growing at over 6% in spite of the aid provided by the world or charities.

  4. Malik Awan says:

    Talkin shit on ere won’t help these ppl food n aid will – so will publicty denouncin bangladesh and Burmas nobel prize winner who did nothing act now





Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 characters available
 

Other Analysis Stories

DVB TV

Senator backs end to Burma sanctions

MOST READ STORIES

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up

Marquee Content Powered By Know How Media