The happiest lot in Burma ahead of US President Barack Obama’s historic visit to the country will be the ex-generals who have continued ruling the country behind the veneer of reforms. The ruling elites have been waiting for this moment since they came into power nearly two years ago. The US’s approval of the country’s reform process has been one of the core political objectives that the regime has tried to secure since transitioning into power.
President Obama will shake hands with most of the leaders of the former military junta except the top two – Than Shwe and Maung Aye who left the centre stage after the quasi-civilian government took power in 2011. It is a disgrace for the US president to make such a historic trip to Burma while hundreds of political prisoners still remain in jails, wars with ethnic minorities continue and societal unrests such as the communal strife in Arakan state and land grabs continue.
Reportedly, President Obama will speak at the Convocation Hall at Rangoon University –a campus that has been virtually closed for decades in order to silence student activists who opposed military rule. However, the university has remained a sacred site to those who stood up against different forms of oppression from colonialism to military dictatorship.
What President Obama decides to talk about at this venue will be of significant interest. Is he ready to say that the Burmese need to continue to struggle for democracy and fight against the dictators in disguise? Will he call the country Myanmar – the name bestowed on the country by the illegitimate military rulers?
In all likelihood, the American head of state will laud President Thein Sein for his so-called role in instituting democratic and irreversible reforms. President Obama will likely make the case for further reforms, which he can then chalk up as a foreign policy accomplishment in the future.
But is the American government really that concerned with the establishment of a democratic government in Burma?
The US’s real interest lies in Burma’s unique geopolitical location. Whether Aung San Suu Kyi continues to ascend the country’s political ladder is no longer the solitary concern of the Obama administration’s Burma policy. While they were ardent supporters of the country’s democracy movement in the past, the US is more interested in forging relationships with allies throughout Asia in an attempt to offset China’s long established influence in the region.
However, it would be a strategic miscalculation if the Obama administration believes the Burmese regime will become its latest ally in the Asia-Pacific region. The regime is populated by a group of military elites who are well-trained xenophobic nationalists. They strongly believe in maintaining relations with neighbouring countries in the region, especially China.
Nevertheless, the former generals of Burma are still eager to regain the US’s support with the goal of receiving funds and training for their military and intelligence forces, which they once enjoyed during the Ne Win era. Although the US was once the most vocal critic against the regime following the 1988 army military coup, in October the American government invited representatives from the Burmese military to observe Cobra Gold – the US’s largest multilateral military exercise in the region.
If President Obama’s trip to Burma signals that the US’s renewed relations with Burma will include providing the Burmese’s military and intelligence forces with support, then the US has taken a disturbing pivot in its relations with Burma and the region.
-Zaw Nay Aung is the Director at Burma Independence Advocates
The opinions and views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect DVB’s editorial policy.
Tags: burma, Government, junta, military, obama, reforms
Senator backs end to Burma sanctions
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
In geopolitics, activists don’t count. Simple.
Welcome to the rough and tumble world of international politics…
There is one thing that a lot of Americans and many Burmese, not to mention many other freedom-loving “rugged individualists” (Han-Solo-types) in the world have in common: “Angst vor China” (China-Angst) or more dramatically: Death by China as in P. Navarro’s and G. Autry’s book. See: http://www.deathbychina.com/
Who wants to live in a world controlled by a 1.4 billion strong ant-like harmonious ethnocentric society following ideological pheromones. Obama is doing serious Realpolitik (ask Metternich or even Machiavelli), not some soft NGO-style human rights academic poli-sci rubbish that’s good for the PC gallery.
As Mao Tsetung said, Power comes out of the barrel of a gun!
I am curious about the fairly common argument that the military leadership is strongly biased toward China. It seems to me that one of the motivations for democratization was to separate Burma from reliance on China by normalizing international relations. The suspension of construction of the Myitsone Dam seemed was a clear and costly signal that Burma no longer wanted to rely on Chinese business interests exclusively. It clearly infuriated China. If the military leadership were only trying to snub China superficially as a show to reformers and the international community, they could have chosen a less costly signal.
I also do not understand why you think the military’s xenophobic leadership would fear the United States more than China. China or Chinese parties have invaded Burma multiple times, and is clearly in a geographical position to dominate Burma if it wished. The United States would act as a convenient, far away counterbalance to Chinese influence, much as it has with much of the Southeast Asian community.
I am not saying that your arguments are invalid, but I have been seeing way too many commentators making arguments about Burmese strategic interests without providing facts, or even logical thought trees.
Dear Zaw Nay Aung
I agree with your comment/opinion on bama military thugs. In fact, bama military thugs do not fear the USA as long as China’s support with veto card in UN. Than shwe and his crony need tempo for their long survival. At the same time, they make use of DASSK in return by promising her to be the next president without military power. DASSK has no choice but something is better than nothing for her. The bama military thugs wants to make the country unrest (Rohingya clash, Kachin fighting, copper mine issue) to get the tempo. Then, they will blame that they can not emphasize the economy. All Burmese learned or learn to live poor for many decades so it is not important or crucial for bama military thugs for the suffering of Burmese people. Bama military thugs want to play the game with both USA and China for their survival tempo. I am not worry about both supper powers who are not idiot but pity on some naive monks and Burmese peoples who could not be totally united (people power)under democratic DASSK or Min Ko Naing. DASSK is surrounded by former military man and might agree with thein sein that she will not be involved in ethnic issue for becoming next president without military power. Burmese people, particularly all ethnics should emphasize or make use of people power to get the military power for the right person (DASSK or Ming Ko Naing) as soon as possible instead of dreaming unproductive illusion or strikes, manipulated by USDP (than shwe and his crony party). DASSK must sincerely promise to honor Panglong agreement.